When
London-listed airline fastjet on Thursday announced its appointment of
Mango CEO Nico Bezuidenhout from August 1, the share price jumped from
£25.85 to as high as £43 on the following afternoon.
From that 66% increase it settled at £39 by market close on Friday.
By
the time of Moneyweb’s interview on Friday afternoon, the increase was
47%. Bezuidenhout called the reaction “mind-blowing”, pointing out that
it represents a R120 million-increase in the market value of the
company.
That
kind of confidence does not come easily and it is testimony not only to
the success of low-cost domestic airline Mango -which he headed from
its inception in 2006 – but also the relationships he has built in the
international aviation industry.
Mango,
a subsidiary of State-owned South African Airways (SAA), is the fourth
fastest-growing airline on the continent, after three major Middle
Eastern airlines and has a 25% share in the domestic market. It was
profitable in all but two years since 2006, Bezuidenhout says.
SAA statement
Nevertheless
SAA issued a statement on Saturday afternoon insinuating that
Bezuidenhout prejudiced SAA in favour of Mango with regard to route
allocation, while rejecting “that there is nexus between Mr Bezuidenhout’s resignation and internal investigations across the Group”.
SAA
also states that Mango’s “much celebrated financial performance” was in
actual fact the result of SAA’s assistance (an incredible about-turn
from previous positions.
SAA
further not-so-subtly reminds its audience of the controversy with
Bezuidenhout’s qualifications. “Under public and media scrutiny about
his qualifications, Mr Bezuidenhout was defended by SAA after he
provided an explanation as to why his academic qualifications were
overstated in the annual report on two successive financial years.”
Loves Mango but . . .
Bezuidenhout
clearly loves Mango and enjoyed his time leading the perky brand. “I
wish I could take my company with me,” he says.
But the relationship with the controversial parent company is clearly not what it should be.
Bezuidenhout
denies running away from an internal investigation. He has been in
talks with fastjet for at least five months and visited London in
February where he met institutional shareholders representing 45% of the
shareholding.
“I wanted to make sure they are committed to the company,” he says.
fastjet potential
fastjet
is a low-cost regional airline operating in Africa. Currently 80% of
its operations are in Tanzania and it also has a presence in Zimbabwe.
Bezuidenhout
sees a lot of potential in the African market. It is hugely
under-served, representing only 3% of global air services and ticket
prices are high. Next year the open skies policy should be implemented,
in terms of inter-governmental agreements concluded last year, and this
will change things dramatically.
fastjet
is not currently profitable and its last reported load factor was only
66%. Bezuidenhout says the company should be prepared for market
changes.
It
has to move its head office from Gatwick outside London to Africa,
lower its cost base, improve its distribution and communicate with
Africans in a way that really talks to them.
For
this purpose he will take lessons from Mango, such as partnering with
known and trusted brands like Shoprite and Vodacom, and partnering with
international airlines to establish connections for travellers from
Europe.
He
will also assess the suitability of the current fleet of A319 planes.
“They have 145 seats, but 100 to 110 seats may be more suitable on most
routes.”
fastjet will have to develop a presence in South Africa, he says.
It
will most probably shrink as corrective steps take effect but could
turn profitable on a month-to-month basis by the end of next year,
Bezuidenhout says.
“I will approach it much as I approached my two terms at SAA,” he says. First, consolidate before you grow.
Leading SAA
He
was twice seconded to act as SAA CEO, the last term ending by mid-2015
after he successfully implemented a 90-day turnaround strategy that
saved the airline R1.2 billion.
But
then he was sent back to Mango and things went haywire at SAA. A R2
billion equity deal with Emirates went south and the SAA board tried to
pull out of the deal Bezuidenhout helped negotiate to restructure SAA’s
costly aircraft procurement. It was eventually concluded in December
after intervention by National Treasury.
“If
only we did two things differently. The Emirates deal did not need
board approval. We should have just done it. And the Airbus deal was
approved as early as April. We should only have added a provision
authorising the CFO to execute it ….”
Is there hope?
Does
he have hope for SAA? “I’m concerned about the loss of skills.
Currently there is an acting CEO at SAA Technical, [at] Air Chefs and
now there will be one at Mango. At SAA itself, there is an acting CEO,
CFO, head of commercial, head of HR and chief procurement officer . . .
“How does one manage a R30 billion-a-year company with that absence of skills and leadership?”
A “soap opera”, he called it on this Talk Radio 702 interview.
He
would have liked to challenge the running of SAA,
but Bezuidenhout says he would only have agreed subject to the political
will being there to do the right things and with a strong board in
place.
He doesn’t want to say much more about the current SAA board and especially its controversial chairperson Dudu Myeni.
He
made personal sacrifices in an effort to get SAA back on track. His
daughter’s birth was scheduled around his SAA meeting schedule. And last
year he had to preside over the retrenchment of about a 1 000 SAA
employees.
These
things are painful, but it makes sense if it saves the company. “But
then you undo all of it five-fold just by negating on the Airbus deal.
And 1 000 families still don’t have food on their tables.”
That makes him sad.
It is not easy to leave Mango, but it is strong and can stand on its own legs. If it is allowed its own space, he says.
Bezuidenhout looks forward to the strict governance requirements the listed environment fastjet operates in.
No comments:
Post a Comment