Kitilya, 2 former Stanbic Bank officers denied bail
THE
Court of Appeal nullified the decision by High Court, which ruled in
favour of former Commissioner General with Tanzania Revenue Authority
(TRA), Harry Kitilya and two others in the 12bn/- criminal trial, over
deletion of money laundering count.
This
follows the decision by Justices Salum Massati, Kipenka Mussa and
Augustine Mwarija to allow the appeal lodged by the Director of Public
Prosecutions (DPP) to challenge the ruling issued by High Court Judge
Moses Mzuna on May 6, this year.
In
his ruling, Judge Mzuna had dismissed the prosecution’s first appeal
against the decision of the Kisutu Resident Magistrate’s Court in Dar es
Salaam, which “strikes out” money laundering count against the accused
persons because it was defective in substance.
The
justices of the appeals court upheld one of grounds of appeal presented
by the prosecution, who had stated that the High Court judge had erred
in law in holding that the order by the trial court striking out the
count in question was an interlocutory order.
They
accepted the position given by Assistant DPP, Oswald Tibabyekomya, for
the prosecution, that the money laundering count was terminated
following the decision given by the trial court and was, thus,
distinguished from the criminal charge.
Therefore,
they held, such order was not interlocutory. “It was, therefore,
erroneous for the judge in the first appeal to hold that the order of
the trial court was interlocutory. We find merits on the first ground of
appeal. Consequently, we allow the appeal, quash and set aside the
proceedings of the High Court,” the justices declared.
In
the judgment read by the Court’s Deputy Registrar Zahra Maluma, the
justices went on, “We order the records be remitted back to the High
Court for the appeal by (the DPP) to be heard by another judge with
competent jurisdiction.”
During
hearing of the appeal, Mr Tibabyekomya was assisted by DPP Biswalo
Mganga, Principal State Attorney Timony Vitalis and Senior State
Attorneys Awamu Mbangwa and Shadrack Kimaro, while advocates Majura
Magafu, Ringo Tenga, Alex Mgongolwa and Godwin Nyaisa, were for accused
persons.
The
prosecution had further submitted that the High Court judge erred in
law in holding that the republic had the right to amend, alter or
substitute the charge, but did not explore those remedies before
resorting to the appeal.
They
had told the court that the act of deleting the count completely
removed the offence as contained to the charge sheet and put to the rest
of the matter in the trial, hence, such decision had final effect and
brought to the end as far as the offence of money laundering was
concerned.
No comments:
Post a Comment